BERLIN (Reuters) – Germany is in for a massive ramp-up in spending under an agreement by the parties hoping to form its next government, with a 500 billion euro special fund sought for infrastructure and plans to unshackle defence investment from its debt rules.
Here is what the plans might mean for growth and debt in Europe’s largest economy:
CAN THE SPENDING BOOST GERMANY’S AILING ECONOMY?
According to economists, yes.
The IMK economic institute currently expects the German economy to eke out barely 0.1% of growth this year, after two consecutive years of contraction in 2023 and 2024, but said the new proposals could make a big difference.
“If the financial package is implemented quickly, a significant acceleration in growth can already be expected in the second half of the year, and growth for the year as a whole could already move noticeably away from stagnation,” said IMK’s economic director Sebastian Dullien.
Germany could even reach growth rates of 2% in the coming years provided there are no new shocks, Dullien said.
WHICH SECTORS ARE SET TO PROFIT MOST?
The construction sector can look forward to a boost from the fund to overhaul Germany’s creaking infrastructure.
Shares in Heidelberg Materials rose by some 14% on Wednesday. Bilfinger
The defence industry also stands to gain. Under the prospective coalition’s plans, Germany’s strict cap on borrowing known as the ‘debt brake’ would be amended in the constitution to exempt defence expenditure above 1% of economic output.
This in effect would mean no upper limit on larger defence spending plans.
German defence companies Rheinmetall, Hensoldt, Thyssenkrupp and Renk
HOW MUCH MORE DEBT WILL GERMANY TAKE ON?
A lot.
Last year, Germany’s debt ratio stood at around 64% of gross domestic product, far lower than that of other major industrialised countries such as the United States and France.
Commerzbank chief economist Joerg Kraemer expects that level to climb noticeably in the coming years – by around 10 percentage points due to the new special fund alone.
Increasing defence spending would push up the debt ratio even further, by an extra 2.5 points annually if, for example, it was ramped up to 3.5% of gross domestic product.
“In 10 years, the overall government debt ratio could rise to 90%, although this also depends on inflation and is therefore not easy to predict,” Kraemer said.
“This would mean that Germany would quickly join the ranks of the EU’s highly indebted states,” ZEW economist Friedrich Heinemann said. He predicts Germany’s indebtedness could even surpass the 100% mark in 2034.
WOULD THIS COST GERMANY ITS TOP CREDIT SCORE OF AAA?
Not necessarily. The spending plans could increase Germany’s debt level to around 72% of gross domestic product by 2029, Scope analyst Eiko Sievert told Reuters – below the previous high of 80% seen in 2010 following the global financial crisis, when Germany was able to maintain its AAA rating.
“Whether this remains possible in the coming years depends also on the implementation of necessary political reforms to strengthen competitiveness and economic growth,” Sievert said.
CAN GERMANY FIND ENOUGH LENDERS?
Germany’s top credit rating makes it a sought-after borrower.
However, higher interest rates would probably be needed to make German government bonds attractive to investors.
“Investors are likely to demand higher risk premiums for German government debt,” says Commerzbank’s Kraemer.
The yield on the 10-year German government bond rose from around 2.5% to 2.7% as investors digested news of the debt and spending plans, indicating that interest costs for the state would likely rise.
COULD GERMANY’S SPENDING SPREE INFLUENCE ECB POLICY?
This could well be the case because pumping hundreds of billions of euros into the economy harbours inflation risks.
“The ECB will have to take into account that inflationary pressure will rise again as a result of the planned expansionary fiscal policy in Germany,” said Cyrus de la Rubia, chief economist at Hamburg Commercial Bank.
(This story has been refiled to fix the RIC for Bilfinger & Renk in paragraphs 8 & 11)
(Reporting by Rene Wagner, Writing by Rachel More; Editing by Gareth Jones)
Comments